ACCA论坛's Archiver

sjky 发表于 2008-10-11 14:05

每日一练F5 答案回复可见

<p>4 Jola Publishing Co publishes two forms of book.<br/>The company publishes a children’s book (CB), which is sold in large quantities to government controlled schools.<br/>The book is produced in only four large production runs but goes through frequent government inspections and quality<br/>assurance checks.<br/>The paper used is strong, designed to resist the damage that can be caused by the young children it is produced for.<br/>The book has only a few words and relies on pictures to convey meaning.<br/>The second book is a comprehensive technical journal (TJ). It is produced in monthly production runs, 12 times a<br/>year. The paper used is of relatively poor quality and is not subject to any governmental controls and consequently<br/>only a small number of inspections are carried out. The TJ uses far more machine hours than the CB in its production.<br/>The directors are concerned about the performance of the two books and are wondering what the impact would be<br/>of a switch to an activity based costing (ABC) approach to accounting for overheads. They currently use absorption<br/>costing, based on machine hours for all overhead calculations. They have accurately produced an analysis for the<br/>accounting year just completed as follows:<br/>CB TJ<br/>$per unit $per unit $per unit $per unit<br/>Direct production costs<br/>Paper 0·75 0·08<br/>Printing ink 1·45 4·47<br/>Machine costs 1·15 1·95<br/>3·35 6·50<br/>Overheads 2·30 3·95<br/>Total cost 5·65 10·45<br/>Selling price 9·05 13·85<br/>Margin 3·40 3·40<br/>The main overheads involved are:<br/>Overhead % of total overhead Activity driver<br/>Property costs 75·0% Machine hours<br/>Quality control 23·0% Number of inspections<br/>Production set up costs 2·0% Number of set ups<br/>If the overheads above were re-allocated under ABC principles then the results would be that the overhead allocation<br/>to CB would be $0·05 higher and the overhead allocated to TJ would be $0·30 lower than previously.<br/>Required:<br/>(a) Explain why the overhead allocations have changed in the way indicated above. (8 marks)<br/>(b) Briefly explain the implementation problems often experienced when ABC is first introduced. (4 marks)<br/>8<br/>The directors are keen to introduce ABC for the coming year and have provided the following cost and selling price<br/>data:<br/>1. The paper used costs $2 per kg for a CB but the TJ paper costs only $1 per kg. The CB uses 400g of paper for<br/>each book, four times as much as the TJ uses.<br/>2. Printing ink costs $30 per litre. The CB uses one third of the printing ink of the larger TJ. The TJ uses 150ml of<br/>printing ink per book.<br/>3. The CB needs six minutes of machine time to produce each book, whereas the TJ needs 10 minutes per book.<br/>The machines cost $12 per hour to run.<br/>4. The sales prices are to be $9·30 for the CB and $14·00 for the TJ<br/>As mentioned above there are three main overheads, the data for these are:<br/>Overhead Annual cost for the coming year<br/>$<br/>Property costs 2,160,000<br/>Quality control 668,000<br/>Production set up costs 52,000<br/>––––––––––<br/>Total 2,880,000<br/>––––––––––<br/>The CB will be inspected on 180 occasions next year, whereas the TJ will be inspected just 20 times.<br/>Jola Publishing will produce its annual output of 1,000,000 CBs in four production runs and approximately 10,000<br/>TJs per month in each of 12 production runs.<br/>Required:<br/>(c) Calculate the cost per unit and the margin for the CB and the TJ using machine hours to absorb the<br/>overheads. (5 marks)<br/>(d) Calculate the cost per unit and the margin for the CB and the TJ using activity based costing principles to<br/>absorb the overheads. (8 marks)<br/>(25 marks)</p><p></p><p>4 Jola Publishing<br/>(a) The first thing to point out is that the overhead allocations to the two products have not changed by that much. For example<br/>the CB has absorbed only $0·05 more overhead. The reason for such a small change is that the overheads are dominated<br/>by property costs (75% of total overhead) and the ‘driver’ for these remains machine hours once the switch to ABC is made.<br/>Thus no difference will result from the switch to ABC in this regard.<br/>The major effect on the cost will be for quality control. It is a major overhead (23% of total) and there is a big difference<br/>between the relative number of machine hours for each product and the number of inspections made (the ABC driver). The<br/>CB takes less time to produce than the TJ, due to the shortness of the book. It will therefore carry a smaller amount of<br/>overhead in this regard. However, given the high degree of government regulation, the CB is subject to ‘frequent’ inspections<br/>whereas the TJ is inspected only rarely. This will mean that under ABC the CB will carry a high proportion of the quality<br/>control cost and hence change the relative cost allocations.<br/>19<br/>The production set up costs are only a small proportion of total cost and would be, therefore, unlikely to cause much of a<br/>difference in the cost allocations between the two products. However this hides the very big difference in treatment. The CB<br/>is produced in four long production runs, whereas the TJ is produced monthly in 12 production runs. The relative proportions<br/>of overhead allocated under the two overhead treatments will be very different. In this case the TJ would carry much more<br/>overhead under ABC than under a machine hours basis of overhead absorption.<br/>(b) There are many problems with ABC, which, despite its academic superiority, cause issues on its introduction.<br/>– Lack of understanding. ABC is not fully understood by many managers and therefore is not fully accepted as a means<br/>of cost control.<br/>– Difficulty in identifying cost drivers. In a practical context, there are frequently difficulties in identifying the appropriate<br/>drivers. For example, property costs are often significant and yet a single driver is difficult to find.<br/>– Lack of appropriate accounting records. ABC needs a new set of accounting records, this is often not immediately<br/>available and therefore resistance to change is common. The setting up of new cost pools is needed which is time<br/>consuming.<br/>(c) Cost per unit calculation using machine hours for overhead absorption<br/>$CB $TJ<br/>Paper (400g at $2/kg) 0·80 (100g at $1/kg) 0·10<br/>Printing (50ml at $30/ltr) 1·50 (150ml at $30/ltr) 4·50<br/>Machine cost (6 mins at $12/hr) 1·20 (10 mins at $12/hr) 2·00<br/>Overheads (6 mins at $24/hr) (W1) 2·40 (10 mins at $24/hr) 4·00<br/>–––– ––––––<br/>Total cost 5·90 10·60<br/>Sales price 9·30 14·00<br/>–––– ––––––<br/>Margin 3·40 3·40<br/>–––– ––––––<br/>(W1) Workings for overheads:<br/>Total overhead $2,880,000<br/>Total machine hours<br/>(1,000,000 x 6 mins) + (120,000 x 10 mins) = 7,200,000 mins<br/>Which is 120,000 hours<br/>Cost per hour =<br/>$2,880,000<br/>––––––––––––– = $24/hr<br/>120,000 hrs<br/>Cost per unit calculations under ABC<br/>CB TJ<br/>$ $<br/>Paper (400g at $2/kg) 0·80 (100g at $1/kg) 0·10<br/>Printing (50ml at $30/ltr) 1·50 (150ml at $30/ltr) 4·50<br/>Machine cost (6 mins at $12/hr) 1·20 (10 mins at $12/hr) 2·00<br/>Overheads (W2) 2·41 (W2) 3·88<br/>–––– ––––––<br/>Total cost 5·91 10·48<br/>Sales price 9·30 14·00<br/>–––– ––––––<br/>Margin 3·39 3·52<br/>–––– ––––––<br/>(W2) Working for ABC overheads alternative:<br/>Total CB TJ No of drivers Cost/driver CB TJ<br/>$ $ $<br/>Property costs 2,160,000 1,800,000 360,000 120,000 18/hr 1·80 3·00<br/>Quality control 668,000 601,200 66,800 200 3340 0·6012 0·56<br/>Production set up 52,000 13,000 39,000 16 3250 0·013 0·325<br/>–––––––––– –––––––––– –––––––– ––––––– ––––––<br/>Total 2,880,000 2,414,200 465,800 Cost per unit 2·41 3·88<br/>Production level 1,000,000 120,000 ––––––– ––––––<br/>Cost per unit 2·41 3·88<br/>––––––– ––––––<br/>The above overheads have been split on the basis of the following activity levels<br/>Driver CB TJ<br/>Property costs Machine hours 100,000 20,000<br/>Quality control Inspections 180 20<br/>Production set up Set ups 4 12<br/>A cost per driver approach is also acceptable.</p>

女孩与飞鸟 发表于 2009-3-25 21:35

的点点滴滴点点滴滴淡淡的的

RAYNAW 发表于 2009-5-16 21:08

adsd

uggshelf 发表于 2009-5-31 15:06

凤凰网

[color=black]楼主说的太好了[/color]










---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't stand in the way of my actualization as a man
[url=http://blog.ifeng.com/2304965.html]凤凰网[/url]

[color=black]支持下楼主~~[/color]

slqc 发表于 2009-5-31 19:27

<p>好像是08年6月真题</p>

commonacc 发表于 2009-6-10 18:00

<p>TKS!</p>

ygmm2002 发表于 2009-6-12 17:35

gljghljglh

jensen_my 发表于 2009-6-22 09:20

x

syzxwx 发表于 2009-6-29 16:34

<span style="FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-ascii-font-family: 'Times New="New"  Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: 'Times New="New"  Roman'; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New="New"  Roman'; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">谢谢</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New="New"  Roman'; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: 宋体">!</span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-ascii-font-family: 'Times New="New"  Roman'; mso-hansi-font-family: 'Times New="New"  Roman'; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New="New"  Roman'; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">辛苦了</span>

艾米叫猫猫 发表于 2010-3-19 01:16

谢谢

页: [1]

Powered by CFAspace Archiver   © 2004-2011 CFAspace.com