ACCA论坛's Archiver

freshman 发表于 2006-8-5 22:16

CMA还是ACCA?

想考个国际证书,本来对ACCA蛮有兴趣,但是最近看到还有个美国的CMA,好象看起来比ACCA容易点,科目也少很多,考起来会省很多时间啊!因为年纪也不小了,所以想速战速决。请大家帮忙出出主意。本人目前没有专业会计经验,希望以后向融资、投资、顾问方面发展。

13140000 发表于 2006-8-16 10:31

<p>若是移民英联邦、欧盟、新加坡,应选ACCA。<br/></p>

kinginsh 发表于 2006-8-28 10:52

<p>美国的 AICPA 和 CMA 都只考4门。</p><p><span lang="ZH-CN" style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;; mso-hansi-font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;; mso-bidi-font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;">需要提醒的是,如果你没有财务工作经验,即使通过全部考试也是拿不到证书的。</span></p>

kinginsh 发表于 2006-9-12 08:56

<p>Why ACCA of course?</p><p>Is it because ACCA has far more parts (14) to take than CMA (4)? Please bear in mind that&nbsp;US-based companies in China are predominant in terms of quantity and total investment.&nbsp; Unfortunately, most CFOs&nbsp;from their mother companies in US don't recognize the certificates&nbsp;outside US,&nbsp;part of the reason is that US GAAP is different from IFRS, although they both will be harmonized some day in the future.</p><p>I&nbsp;have no intention to downplay ACCA because I'm&nbsp;proceeding to ACCA. In the meantime, I'm a CMA.&nbsp;</p>

kinginsh 发表于 2006-9-12 09:08

By the way, if your&nbsp;career target is&nbsp;to work&nbsp;in investment banking and financing areas, I strongly recommend CFA.

woaiyugege 发表于 2006-10-2 21:21

<p>agree with ls.</p>

页: [1]

Powered by CFAspace Archiver   © 2004-2011 CFAspace.com